OK, so let’s talk about the new Microsoft Surface a little more.
I have spent some time thinking about this move from Microsoft and I wanted to use you guys and girls as my sounding board.
For context, Microsoft recently developed and built from scratch their own Windows 8 tablet and it’s been named the “Microsoft Surface”.
Now this is a big deal because it’s the first time the software giant has seemed to compete with it’s own manufacturing partners (OEM’s).
There’s a lot we don’t know about the Surface (price, battery life etc) but the biggest mystery is why Microsoft did this.
There have been some theories proffered on the web:
Microsoft was trying to front-run Google’s I/O developer confab this week in San Francisco and rushed it. – Larry Dignan
Microsoft is not throwing its OEM partners under the bus. It is pushing them out of the way of an onrushing freight train. Ed Bott
The announcement of the Surface shows that Microsoft is ready to make a break with its history — a history of hardware partnerships which relied on companies like Dell, HP, or Acer to actually bring its products to market. Joshua Topolsky
Let’s be clear, though: Microsoft making hardware is not a natural action. It’s what the company does in times of desperation. Ashlee Vance
And on and on it goes.
What is clear is that Microsoft seems to be ready to make a clean break from their history and go it alone in the tablet space.
I have to disagree with Ed Bott slightly because I think that Microsoft didn’t build the Surface to give OEM’s a heads up.
If Microsoft wanted to give OEM’s a heads up, it could have partnered with Samsung on a jointly built, Microsoft branded, Surface tablet and made that the standard.
In addition, they could have waived the licensing fee for Samsung and subsdized the tablets to send a message. It would have been easy to do, faster, cheaper and accomplished a lot of the same results.
In addition, Samsung is a preferred partner having provided the 5000 tablets for BUILD last year. There’s no question that the partnership would have worked and OEM’s would have been forced to pay attention.
But Microsoft didn’t go that way. Instead, they chose the more difficult path of internal R&D, tons of secrecy and 100% ownership.
In my humble opinion, a rational company doesn’t go to all that trouble to just send a message. They go to all that trouble to be successful.
I believe that Microsoft will market the crap out of the Surface and watch very carefully how much it does or does not sell. If there are signs of success, all bets are off regarding what devices they make in the future.
If it is even moderately successful, it will instantly eat up some existing OEM market share. Make no mistake, the Microsoft Surface will be successful at the expense of Dell or Samsung or some other Windows tablet maker. The market simply won’t be big enough for everyone.
There will be blood.
I think that for Microsoft, the Surface is the just beginning of the big push into hardware. I believe that they are being politically delicate about it because it is (understandably) a sensitive issue for OEM’s.
If this push sees moderate success, I believe they will make a Windows Phone and one or two Windows Desktop devices. Why the heck not? Once you start building your own stuff, why stop at tablets and phones?
Microsoft is a publicly traded company – there would be no rational reason to walk away from potential profits if they didn’t have to.
There will also be two major effects of Microsoft entering this space:
If you are an OEM who makes tablets, phones and PC’s, you have been warned.
In the next few years, your profit margins will get even slimmer than they are now (which as you know is pretty darn slim already).
Adapt or die.