Not long ago I embarked upon a quest to give up using the desktop as much as possible in favor of a Metro-focused PC experience. In this experiment I wanted to go at least a week using Metro for at least 75% of my daily computing tasks. So how did I do overall? I’m proud to say that I lasted a little over a week before I decided to end the experiment.

Overall I found that between online solutions like the online MS Office app and the use of the apps within Metro I was largely able to abstain from logging into the desktop except when I had articles or work that needed me to enter. It was an interesting experiment to see how well Metro could fit into my daily life.

I knew it wouldn’t be a perfect experiment thanks to the lack of apps, something that I’m sure will change after Windows 8 become a commercial product.

It wasn’t that hard to get used to using Metro for most tasks, but honestly I found that this article’s focus shouldn’t be on the week or so that I used Metro – what about the time since?

In the many days that have followed, has my Windows 8 Metro/Desktop ratio changed from the days before I forced myself to primarily use Metro? The answer to that question is actually no. Before the experiment I used Metro less than 25% of the time I was in Windows 8. Now I find myself going into Metro primarily because most of my desktop programs have shortcuts there, but in reality it is still only about 25%, maybe even less.

Metro has become nothing more than a fancy start menu replacement for me. Rarely do I use any Metro apps beyond the highly addictive game, Cut The Rope, and I’ve completely abandoned daily use of Internet Explorer.

So why didn’t Metro have a longer lasting effect on my computing habits? It boils down to this: Metro is a faster, more minimalistic experience than what you find on the desktop. For many users this is going to be a part of the appeal. For a power-user type though? Metro is pretty and as it gets more apps I’m certain I will see my use of Metro go up, by I’ve also decided I like the complexity, and control, that desktop brings to the equation.

No matter how many improvements come to Metro, such as high-quality apps, I am almost guaranteed to find myself drawn to the old-school environment that is Windows 8 desktop. So does this mean that Microsoft failed to create a product that is appealing for power-user (old-school) types and the more casual crowd? Not necessarily.

I really believe that Metro will appeal to casual users, once they become familiar with it. If Microsoft can give them reason to adjust to it like I did with my experiment, these types of users will likely find little reason to return to the complex desktop world.

As for power-users, the draw in Windows 8 isn’t Metro and probably never will be (at least not for the majority). Sure, some of us will use it on occasion but the real beauty I find in Windows 8 is the speed. Its faster and rather stable (though I’ve had some minor beta-related issues).

I’m also a very impatient man and the other day I had to use our Windows 7 desktop. Upon start-up I became annoyed at how long it was taking. This is because Windows 8 has me spoiled. On most start-ups, from complete shut-off, it takes only around 9-12 seconds… this is impressive no matter how you look at it.

So if Microsoft can market Windows 8 to power-user types as a “speedier experience than Windows 7” and market it as a “Easier to use, no-nonsense solution compared to Windows 7”- well than it can in fact appeal to a wide range of users despite its many changes when compared to traditional Windows.

What do you think? Will Microsoft be able to market Windows 8 effectively to show it has mass appeal to everyone, despite its new Metro UI? Share your thoughts below.

Related Posts

What in blue blazes! If you needed more proof that Microsoft wants to keep the Surface Pen an...

Stranger things have happened! Microsoft is contemplating a new key on the keyboard of PCs and...

Microsoft has just launched a new video series called Microsoft Unboxed, with the goal of...

Leave a Reply