It’s 2012 and the world of computers has begun to get a bit more confusing as the traditional PC continues to become more and more pushed into the background, in favor of Internet-capable devices and mobile computing systems.
Some go so far as to say that the desktop PC is essentially dead, and that the laptop isn’t far behind. While going that far seems like a bit of a stretch to me, it seems that the beginning of the end is in sight, though I think it could take decades for this ‘new vision’ to truly be realized- at least in my opinion.
A big part of this change is Windows 8, and the fact that it is changing things up puts it in the unique position of being hailed as the messiah or as the devil incarnate, depending which group of techies you ask. So what truly makes Windows 8 a change?
Obviously the Metro UI, but the bigger picture is how Windows 8 (and RT) is billing itself. There was a time when mobile devices and mobile computers were designed to look/feel/work more like PCs. The marketing teams worked to let you know “it’s like having a PC in your pocket” and other such mantras.
Windows 8 flip-flops this principle and the marketing is more like, “It’s like having a mobile phone that sits on your desk.” Windows 8 promises to make the computing experience just work, more like a simple tech-device, and less like a PC. That, in theory, means an easy-to-use interface, less crashing, and less need for true technical skills and knowledge. Does Windows 8 fully realize this goal, though?
It’s a start, but there are few things that are holding it back from fully moving on from feeling like a PC.
You can’t do everything in Metro
To really feel more like a mobile, easy-to-use device, Windows 8’s new device-like, touch-optimized UI (Metro) should be a bit more dependent. Managing basic files, changing important settings, and the like should exist without needing the desktop. This is especially true in Windows RT.
It’s still based on an aging PC platform.
While not everyone will agree, I truly think that Microsoft’s ambitious goal of making the PC less like a PC can’t be realized with Windows. It needs powerful anti-virus and anti-malware solutions, it needs fragmentation, and other maintenance that still makes its upkeep seem more like a PC than a phone.
Windows 8 took the Windows source in a very different direction but at its heart it’s still Windows. To really make this revolution come true, all of this will need to be addressed and perhaps even backwards compatibility and legacy support will need to be dropped.
It still is two different UI in one package.
Okay, point one kind of addressed this – but it’s so important I guess I’ll sort of repeat myself. Windows 8 still feels a little like two operating systems bolted together. This works, and I really like Windows 8, but if Microsoft is truly serious about moving on and creating a fully mobile/easy OS, a few bridge tools between the two UI’s isn’t enough. The best solution? Probably removing the desktop altogether.
The bigger question is, should Microsoft make any of the changes that I mentioned in the three points? That depends on who you ask, personally, I don’t want to get rid of the desktop, I like it. To really make it more like a mobile device and less like a PC, though, it might be necessary.
I’m curious, who all wants that kind of change? Do you want your PC to simply work, with little control, little maintenance, and no need to really have major PC technical skills? I guess as a nerd, I would rather things stay as they are.
Again, do I really have a choice? No, if the tech-companies like Microsoft and Apple want to move away from the PC-centric design of their operating systems, the only choice left is to either go with the flow or become a full-time open-source rebel.
So, do I like Windows 8? Yes, I do. Do I hope that Windows 9 goes even a step further in Microsoft’s goal to remove the PC-like feel from the computer?
Not really, but it might happen anyway.
What do you think?
Share your thoughts below.